Op-Ed: End Racial Profiling Now (Participation)

Op-Ed: End Racial Profiling Now

Yesterday, the Baltimore Sun published an op-ed by Margaret Huang of the Rights Working Group and Benjamin Jealous of the NAACP on racial profiling.

The op-ed is published in it’s entirety below:

December 7, 20009

The End Racial Profiling Act (ERPA) will soon be reintroduced by Rep. John Conyers, Democrat of Michigan, and Sen. Russ Feingold, Democrat of Wisconsin. Numerous incidents throughout American history have taught us that racial profiling not only fails as a law enforcement tool but ultimately makes us all less safe. Passage of ERPA would be an important step toward ending racial profiling.

Over a century ago, Leon Czolgosz walked up to President William McKinley with a concealed weapon and shot him. The Secret Service agent assigned to search the president’s visitors was focused on a “dark complexioned man” in line behind Czolgosz. Ironically, the same man whose appearance made the agent suspicious – Jim Parker, an African-American former constable – saved President McKinley from a third bullet.

In 1995, after the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah federal building in Oklahoma City, Timothy McVeigh, the white male assailant, fled while law enforcement officers looked for “Arab terrorists” whom they thought responsible.

Racial profiling does not always target minorities. In 2002, during the sniper attacks that terrorized Washington-area residents for months, police conducted surveillance searching for a disaffected white man with an accomplice, driving a white van. During that time, the actual culprits – an African-American man and boy who fit many of the characteristics of a serial killer, except that they were black – came into contact with police at least 10 times without being apprehended. How many lives would have been saved had race not been a part of the profile?

As airport security agents focused on people of Middle Eastern descent following the Sept. 11 attacks, Nathaniel Heatwole, a white college student, was able to smuggle knives, box cutters, bleach and other items onto at least six planes from February to September 2003. He then sent numerous e-mails to the Transportation Security Administration notifying them of his actions. It took the TSA more than a month to find the hidden items.

Just as history has shown that using race as a proxy for criminality is bad policy, history also shows that focusing on behavior over race is smart policy. When law enforcement officers eliminate race as a factor and instead rely on behavior, they catch more people who break the law. In the late 1990s, as a response to discrimination lawsuits, the U.S. Customs Service eliminated the use of race in deciding which individuals to stop and search for illegal contraband and instead began focusing on suspect behavior. Studies showed that this shift to “color-blind profiling techniques” increased the rate of productive searches (those leading to the discovery of illegal contraband or activity) by more than 300 percent.

Other examples in our nation’s history demonstrate that we can be smart and safe in our efforts to find people who break the law, as opposed to focusing on people’s race, gender or national origin. In the 1970s, the Secret Service relied on a presidential assassin profile that excluded females. After Sara Jane Moore took a shot at President Gerald Ford, the gender limitation was removed from this profile, a move that potentially saved President George H.W. Bush in 1992 when a young woman was arrested for threatening to kill him after bringing a rifle to a rally at which he was scheduled to speak.

Some enlightened members of Congress analyzed the culmination of evidence proving the ineffectiveness of racial profiling and introduced a bill that would ban racial profiling by federal, state and local law enforcement. The ERPA was first introduced in 2001 and gained bipartisan support. Unfortunately, after Sept. 11, misplaced fear stemmed the momentum for ERPA, and the U.S. government embarked on an era of intense profiling, rounding up more than 1,200 Arab, South Asian and Muslim men and holding them without charges.

Such action did not make us safer. In fact, the mass roundup within the United States after Sept. 11 never apprehended anyone subsequently officially linked to the attacks. An inspector general’s report later revealed that many of the detainees had been blocked from contacting attorneys and that some of them had been beaten or otherwise physically abused by guards in federal prisons.

Unfortunately, the scope of racial profiling is expanding. As the responsibility for enforcing immigration laws and finding undocumented immigrants has been increasingly delegated to state and local police, evidence of increased racial profiling is emerging across the country.

President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder have stated that ending racial profiling is a “priority.” The more than 40 members of Congress planning to reintroduce the ERPA agree.

It’s time to face the truth: Racial profiling is a violation of our constitutional and human rights, and it distracts the attention of law enforcement from real suspects, which puts all of us at risk. The ERPA should be passed this year, ensuring greater safety for all of our communities.
Benjamin Todd Jealous is president and CEO of the Baltimore-based NAACP. His e-mail is communications@naacpnet.org. Margaret Huang is executive director of the Rights Working Group. Her e-mail is mhuang@rightsworkinggroup.org.


7 thoughts on “Op-Ed: End Racial Profiling Now (Participation)

  1. Although I support the End Racial Profiling Act, I feel that society is far from that accomplishment. It is still in our human nature to make snap judgments based off of racial profiling. There is far too much attention on race within the media and within society for people to stop racial profiling all together. Until the color of your skin is not even a topic of interest to society, I believe that this act will not be successful.

    • If racial profiling is happening, can there be too much attention on that from the media? How often does the media and others address racial profiling or housing discrimination

    • I disagree. I believe that for racial profiling to end once and for all the best way to go about it would be for the media to put more focus on the topic of racism, as colorblindness has never been a solution to racism. “Race” will always be a topic of conversation, as there are so many different ethnic backgrounds and cultures throughout the world. And not to mention we should learn about and celebrate each other’s differences, as such qualities are a part who people are and what makes them unique. Therefore, we need not forget the color of the skin, but we should rid ourselves of the ignorance of it if we are to eventually end racial profiling.

  2. I spoke with my dad about the 1995 Oklahoma City bombings and how they first believed that “arab terrorists” were responsible. He told me about how all of the news networks were were assuming this to be true. When it turned out to be a white male that was responsible for the acts, people at first didn’t know what to think, because ultimately their perception of violence and terrorism and it’s relation to race had been changed.

  3. From the past years, citizens focused more on racial issues than suspect behavior when they were suppose to focus on suspicious behavior. The Boston Bombing happened this year and people thought Arab terrorists were responsible, but it turned out to be a couple of white men. People just rely on past issues and just blame Arabs because they were responsible for past terrorist attacks. The race shouldn’t be focused on, they should rely on people who act suspiciously. The ERPA should be passed to end discrimination on race.

  4. The ERPA is very good point. IF there is a terrorist team in my country, and IF I am a boss, I will never send person whose appearance is from my country. This is true that Race is easy to follow as clue, but I think outwitting Race Profiling is much easy in some way. To improve this issue, I support ERPA, we should not pay too much attention to the race. I believe that race profiling is feckless.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s